Observe the graph :
\The function
has absolute maximum at
.
The function
has a relative maximum at
and relative minimum at
.
It is also appears that
and
, so the conjecture that this function has no absolute minimum.
Support numerically :
\Construct the table of values.
\Choose
-values on either side of the estimated
-value for each extremum, as well as one very large and one very small value for
.
![]() | \
![]() | \
![]() | \
![]() | \
![]() | \
![]() | \
![]() | \
![]() | \
![]() | \
![]() | \
![]() | \
![]() | \
![]() | \
![]() | \
![]() | \
![]() | \
![]() | \
![]() | \
![]() | \
![]() | \
![]() | \
![]() | \
![]() | \
![]() | \
Observe the above table :
\Because
and
, there is an absolute maximum in the interval
. The approximate value of the absolute maximum is
. Like wise, because
and
, there is a relative minimum in the interval
. The approximate value of this relative minimum is
.
Because
and
, there is a relative maximum in the interval
.
The approximate value of this relative maximum is
.
and
, which supports the conjecture that the function has no absolute minimum.
The absolute maximum is at
.
The relative maximum is
and relative minimum is at
.